2012 Heath Care Heroes Team

Joint Commission Seal

Children's Board Hillsborough County

Emergency Prepardness
Telephone
813.239.8561

Employee Email

Ask Joe

 

 


powered by centersite dot net
Child & Adolescent Development: Overview
Resources
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest News
ATS: Adenotonsillectomy Offers Relief to Kids With Sleep ApneaWeather Worries Can Threaten a Child's Mental HealthPrimary Care Docs Should Play Role in Kids' Dental Health, Experts SayStudy: Older Whooping Cough Vaccine More EffectiveHealth Tip: Help Children Eat Healthier1 in 5 U.S. Kids Has a Mental Health Disorder: CDCSchool-Based Smoking Prevention Programs WorkBrain Anatomy in Dyslexics Varies By Gender, Study FindsEven Mild Iodine Deficiency Can Affect Child's CognitionMany U.S. Kids Victims of Violence, Abuse: SurveyMore Time in Gym Class Equals Stronger KidsMagnesium-Rich Food May Help Keep Kids' Bones StrongGasoline Poisonings in Kids Spike During Summer: StudyPAS: Children With Strep Don't Need to Toss ToothbrushesMany Parents Texting, Phoning While Driving Their Kids: SurveyMany Suicidal Kids Have Access to Guns at Home: StudyMore Kids Diagnosed With Mental Health Disabilities, Study Finds1997 to 2011 Saw Increase in Allergies Among U.S. ChildrenPreordered School Lunches May Be Healthier, Study FindsAt-Home Drug Errors Common for Kids With Cancer, Research ShowsFood, Skin Allergies on the Rise Among Children: CDCMore Than 4,000 U.S. Kids Hurt Each Year on Amusement RidesFDA Concerned Caffeinated Foods Could Harm ChildrenSecondhand Smoke Tied to Lower 'Good' Cholesterol in Teen GirlsChild Fruit Consumption Up With Pre-Slicing in SchoolsAllergies: As American as Apple Pie?Why Johnny Can't Add, Even After TutoringPoor Parenting Styles Linked to Bullying Behavior in KidsImpact of Childhood Bacterial Meningitis Lasts Into Adulthood'Clean Your Plate' Orders From Parents May Backfire for KidsPopular Cinnamon Stunt Can Have Serious Lung EffectsAMSSM: Cognitive Effect of Concussion Lasts in ChildrenMany Parents Text, Phone With Kids in Car: SurveyMigraines in Children Linked to Infantile ColicHelping Children Make Sense of the SenselessSocial Networks Affect Parents' Vaccination Decision-MakingHealth Tip: What's Keeping Your Child Awake?Parenting Magazines Give Little Attention to Sun ProtectionSleep Apnea Tied to Behavioral, Attention Problems in YouthsParents' Military Deployment Takes Toll on Kids, Study FindsMental Health Care Lacking for Kids, Advocates SayDespite Big Progress, Many Kids Have High Lead Levels in BloodMelanoma Rates Rising in U.S. ChildrenHigher Activity Levels May Protect Children From StressManagement of Short Stature in Childhood DiscussedCertain Parents Less Likely to Follow Doctors' Advice: PollU.S. Agency Puts Poison Prevention in SpotlightAntipsychotic Drug Use Rising for Kids on Medicaid, Study FindsPicky Eating in Youngsters Might Be Largely Caused by GenesGene Mutations Appear Key to Childhood Leukemia Risk, Study Says
Links
Related Topics

ADHD: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Childhood Mental Disorders and Illnesses
Child Care
Child Development and Parenting: Infants
Child Development and Parenting: Early Childhood
Child Development and Parenting: Middle Childhood

Doctors Spar Over Cholesterol Screening in Kids

HealthDay News
by By Amanda GardnerHealthDay Reporter
Updated: Jul 23rd 2012

 

new article illustration

MONDAY, July 23 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers are debating the merits of recent guidelines that recommend all children aged 9 through 11 be screened for high cholesterol levels, along with certain groups of younger children and teenagers.

The guidelines were written by a panel convened by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and published in the journal Pediatrics last November.

But now doctors publishing in the current issue of Pediatrics say the guidelines are too aggressive and not based solidly on evidence. The paper is joined by a rebuttal from the authors of the guidelines.

The critics of the guidelines make many arguments, including that the guidelines were based more on expert opinion than on solid evidence and that many authors of the guidelines reported industry disclosures.

Dr. Stephen Daniels, chairman of the guidelines panel and head of pediatrics at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, defended the panel Monday to the Associated Press.

Industry ties "were vetted during the discussions of the panel and I think really did not influence the debate," he told the AP.

Daniels, a co-author of the rebuttal, reported having worked as a consultant or advisory board member for Abbott Laboratories, Merck and Schering-Plough, now part of Merck. Seven other panel members also made disclosures.

But the critics had other objections as well.

"There is expense and inconvenience to the family to have to get to the doctor before breakfast," said Dr. Thomas Newman, co-author of the journal commentary article, referring to the recommendation that higher-risk 2- to 8-year-olds and 12- to 16-year-olds be screened after fasting.

There also is the issue of potentially giving lifetime medication to a large group of people. The guidelines estimated that about 1 percent of kids would be put on cholesterol-lowering medications if the guidelines were followed.

"[We don't know] how many children would need to be treated to prevent one heart disease death," said Newman, who is a professor of epidemiology and biostatistics and pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco. "The medications would have to be extraordinarily safe, and there haven't been big studies with large enough numbers of children for long enough to know."

Newman recommends cholesterol screening start at adulthood and obese children not be screened too early.

"Many of these kids have totally normal lipid levels and many with high lipid levels are not obese," he said. "You can tell if someone needs to lose weight without having to do any blood test and recommendations for diet and exercise really apply to everybody."

But the issue of whom to screen and when is far from straightforward, said one cardiologist who was involved with neither the original guidelines nor the rebuttal.

"It's a tough call; it's ... worthy of debate," said Dr. Stephen Cook, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, N.Y. Cook also said there may be an argument for universal or near-universal screening to identify kids with familial hypercholesterolemia, a genetic trait resulting in high cholesterol levels unusually early in life.

Cholesterol-lowering drugs during childhood may be able to stave off heart disease in this group of children, the rebuttal authors noted.

More information

The Nemours Foundation has more on children and cholesterol.